Purpose of the articles posted in the blog is to share knowledge and occurring events for ecology and biodiversity conservation and protection whereas biology will be human’s security. Remember, these are meant to be conversation starters, not mere broadcasts :) so I kindly request and would vastly prefer that you share your comments and thoughts on the blog-version of this Focus on Arts and Ecology (all its past + present + future).

Premium Blogger Themes - Starting From $10
#Post Title #Post Title #Post Title

Why so many Americans think Buddhism is just a philosophy

January 22, 2018 10.26pm AEDT

Sakya Monastery of Tibetan Buddhism, Seattle, Washington. WonderlaneCC BY

Author

  1. Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Elon University

Disclosure statement

Pamela Winfield has received funding from. The Association of Asian Studies (2013 - short term research trip to Eiheiji temple, Japan) Asia Cultural Council (2007 - 6 months research in Tokyo) Kobe College Corporation / Japan Educational Exchange (2001-2002 - dissertation research in Kyoto)

Partners

Elon University provides funding as a member of The Conversation US.

In East Asia, Buddhists celebrate the Buddha’s death and entrance into final enlightenment in February. But at my local Zen temple in North Carolina, the Buddha’s enlightenment is commemorated during the holiday season of December, with a short talk for the children, a candlelight service and a potluck supper following the celebration.
Welcome to Buddhism, American-style.

Early influences

Buddhism entered into the American cultural consciousness in the late 19th century. It was a time when romantic notions of exotic Oriental mysticism fueled the imaginations of American philosopher-poets, art connoisseurs, and early scholars of world religions.
Transcendental poets like Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson read Hindu and Buddhist philosophy deeply, as did Henry Steel Olcott, who traveled to Sri Lanka in 1880, converted to Buddhism and founded the popular strain of mystical philosophy called Theosophy.
Buddhist monk, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Lorianne DiSabatoCC BY-NC-ND
Meanwhile, connoisseurs of Buddhist art introduced America to the beauty of the tradition. The art historian and professor of philosophy Ernest Fenellosa, as well as his fellow Bostonian William Sturgis Bigelow, were among the first Americans to travel to Japan, convert to Buddhism and avidly collect Buddhist art. When they returned home, their collections formed the core of the premiere Arts of Asia collection at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
At the same time, early scholars of world religions such as Paul Carus made Buddhist teachings readily accessible to Americans. He published “The Gospel of Buddha,” a best-selling collection of Buddhist parables, a year after attending the World Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893. This was the first time in modern history that representatives from the world’s major religions came together to learn about one another’s spiritual traditions.
The Buddhist delegation in Chicago included the Japanese Zen master Shaku Sōen and the Sri Lankan Buddhist reformer Anagārika Dharmapāla, who himself had studied western science and philosophy to modernize his own tradition. These Western-influenced Buddhists presented their tradition to their modern Western audience as a “non-theistic” and “rational” tradition that had no competing gods, irrational beliefs or supposedly meaningless rituals to speak of.

Continuity and change

Pressmaster/ Shutterstock.com
Traditional Buddhism does in fact have many deities, doctrines and rituals, as well as sacred texts, ordained priests, ethics, sectarian developments and other elements that one would typically associate with any organized religion. But at the 1893 World Parliament, the Buddhist masters favorably presented their meditative tradition to modern America only as a practical philosophy, not a religion. This perception of Buddhism persists in America to this day.
The Buddhists did not deliberately misrepresent their tradition or just tell the Americans what they wanted to hear. They were genuine in their attempt to make a 2500-year old tradition relevant to the late 19th century.
But in the end they only transplanted but a few branches of Buddhism’s much larger tree into American soil. Only a few cuttings of Buddhist philosophy, art and meditation came into America, while many other traditional elements of the Buddhist religion remained behind in Asia.

Buddhism in America

Once it was planted here though, Americans became particularly fascinated with the mystical appeal of Buddhist meditation.
DT Suzuki. Portrait of D. T. Suzuki made by his secretary Mihoko Okamura via Wikimedia Commons.
The lay Zen teacher Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki, who was Japanese Zen Master Shaku Sōen’s student and translator at the World’s Parliament, influenced many leading artists and intellectuals in the postwar period. Thanks to his popular writings and to subsequent waves of Asian and American Buddhist teachers, Buddhism has impacted almost every aspect of American culture.
Environmental and social justice initiatives have embraced a movement known as “Engaged Buddhism” ever since Martin Luther King Jr. nominated its founder, the Vietnamese monk and anti-war activist Thich Nhat Hanh, for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1967. His Buddhist Order of Interbeing continues to propose mindful, nonviolent solutions to the world’s most pressing moral concerns.
America’s educational system has also been enriched by its first Buddhist-affiliated university at Naropa in Colorado, which paved the way for other Buddhist institutions of higher learning such as Soka University and University of the West in California, as well as Maitripa College in Oregon.
The medical establishment too has integrated mindfulness-based stress reduction into mainstream therapies, and many prison anger management programs are based on Buddhist contemplative techniques such as Vipassana insight meditation.
The same is true of the entertainment industry that has incorporated Buddhist themes into Hollywood blockbusters, such as “The Matrix”. Even professional athletics have used Zen coaching strategies and furthered America’s understanding of Buddhism not as a “religion” but as a secular philosophy with broad applications.

The exotic appeal

Jack Kerouac. Geoth
But American secular Buddhism has also produced some unintended consequences. Suzuki’s writings greatly influenced Jack Kerouac, the popular Beat Generationauthor of “On the Road” and “The Dharma Bums.” But Suzuki regarded Kerouac as a “monstrous imposter” because he sought only the freedom of Buddhist awakening without the discipline of practice.
Other Beat poets, hippies and, later, New Age DIY self-helpers have also paradoxically mistaken Buddhism for a kind of self-indulgent narcissism, despite its teachings of selflessness and compassion. Still others have commercially exploited its exotic appeal to sell everything from “Zen tea” to “Lucky Buddha Beer,” which is particularly ironic given Buddhism’s traditional proscription against alcohol and other intoxicants.
As a result, the popular construction of nonreligious Buddhism has contributed much to the contemporary “spiritual but not religious” phenomenon, as well as to the secularized and commodified mindfulness movement in America.
We may have only transplanted a fraction of the larger bodhi tree of religious Buddhism in America, but our cutting has adapted and taken root in our secular, scientific and highly commercialized age. For better and for worse, it’s Buddhism, American-style.

The Conversation is a non-profit + your donation is tax deductible. Help knowledge-based, ethical journalism today.

You might also like
1 Comment
  1. Gadah Aziz

    so, i play a game of mental experimentation
    in this game i go back in time to when Buddhism is in its ascendancy and the Buddha is at the peak of his teaching
    i studiously write down all of the points the Buddha makes - all the things that make Buddhism “the Way”
    then I say to the Buddha
    “if I remove this little piece of your teaching will what remains still be the Way?”
    in my mind experiment i will assume that the Enlightened One will either tell me
    “yes, what remains is still the way”
    or he will say “No, what has been removed is essential to The Way”
    (i put aside another answer “to ask such a question is to step off the path”)
    so if he’d said “no” then the only Buddhism would be what the Buddha taught back then - nothing less - but we know that Buddhism spread and took root in many forms throughout the world
    so we must assume the answer would have been “yes”
    If removing a little piece of “the way” then leaves behind that which is still “the way”
    what must we remove for it to no longer be “the way”?
    can we shred and shed until we find something that, if removed, would result in the loss of “the way”?
    i know that many practitioners of Vipassana meditation are adamant that the core and only important part of Buddhism is mindfulness meditation yet when you attend 10 day sits there is much talk of other aspects of the way - Meta for one, compassion another - such that another experiment leaps to mind - adding bits of “the way” back in until such folks proclaim that what we have is no longer “the way”
    I would imagine that most of the Hindu bits of Buddhism (which, i have read, were intrinsic to original teachings) could be shed and would naturally be shed by “rational” types frightened off by any “God” bits of the way.
    That would include of course shedding samsara, rebirth, and therefore “the wheel” which unfortunately. having eight spokes threatens the removal of the eight-fold path - something most, if not all, Buddhists would agree is intrinsic to Buddhism.
    I guess pretty much all of the new generation of Buddhists might be happy to shed all of the Sangha even though that’s the biggest body of Buddhist work and would render conversion a problem - as the Three Jewels are referenced in the process but never mind, “conversion” might be a concept shed also
    Even the eight-fold path is shed, in a way, even by early lay practitioners, when Śīla became central to their observance
    cutting to the chase then, if everything could be shed, yet still be something we can call Buddhism, what is Buddhism?
    When studying in a Christian college I came across a book in the library - it was about “New Age” Christianity
    It defined it in something like this way:
    Those who are born into and grow up in what is essentially a Christian culture can not shed the effect of that upbringing. When they seek other ways based on their need to make rational choices, everything they do and all that they choose is, in fact, some aspect of Christianity that they feel comfortable with while what they do not choose is what they do not feel comfortable with
    If such is the case then there is no “Buddhism” in America other than within the enclaves of immigrants from Buddhist cultures
    There is only variations of Christianity
    That there are scholars who believe that early Christian thought was strongly influenced by Buddhists sent out by Ashoka leads me back through full circle
    Peace

    Powered By Blogger