Focus on Arts and Ecology

Purpose of the articles posted in the blog is to share knowledge and occurring events for ecology and biodiversity conservation and protection whereas biology will be human’s security. Remember, these are meant to be conversation starters, not mere broadcasts :) so I kindly request and would vastly prefer that you share your comments and thoughts on the blog-version of this Focus on Arts and Ecology (all its past + present + future).

Premium Blogger Themes - Starting From $10
#Post Title #Post Title #Post Title

The coffee farms weighing climate and the market in Brazil

In Minas Gerais state, rising prices are steering some small-scale farmers from the sustainable practices that can mitigate climate change. 

Edson Paes, 53, has single-handedly cultivated 12,000 organic Arabica coffee plants on three hectares of land since he was 14. His life’s work grows in the town of Poço Fundo, southern Minas Gerais. This state in south-eastern Brazil is one of the country’s main coffee growing regions.

In recent years, however, his work has become increasingly difficult because of climate change. He says a drought last year brought 45 days without rain: “The coffee suffered a lot.” Rising temperatures are also taking their toll. On his land, coffee leaves with brownish spots reveal sunscald, a problem linked to temperatures too high for cultivation. “Standing all day under this sun is getting difficult,” Paes tells Dialogue Earth on a hot January afternoon.

Paes is far from alone in facing these challenges. Five consecutive Arabica coffee harvests have been affected by climatic events such as heatwaves, droughts and frosts. A study by Brazil’s Federal University of Itajubá (Unifei) published in 2024 indicates that, as global warming and water stress intensify, between 35% and 75% of the areas in Brazil currently planted with Arabica coffee could become economically unviable by the end of the century.

Edson Paes endures a very hot day on his 3-hectare coffee plantation in Poço Fundo, southern Minas Gerais (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

This coffee plant on Paes’s farm bears the marks of sunscald, a problem linked to temperatures that are too high for cultivation (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

These climate-related challenges have pushed up prices as the global supply tightens. Even with shipments falling by 20% between 2024 and 2025, Brazil – already the world’s leading coffee producer and exporter – registered record export revenue of USD 15.5 billion last year.

Asia is becoming the new growth centre of the global coffee market, with rising consumption in China, India, Indonesia and Vietnam turning the region into a major force as it shapes demand, café culture and future industry trends.

A region driven by coffee

Coffee “makes everything happen” in Poço Fundo, according to Rosiel de Lima, the town’s mayor. Its 16,000 inhabitants rely on family farming as the driving force of the local economy. Many of the beans are destined for export. Almost all of Paes’s production is sent to Europe, Japan and the US via Coopfam, a cooperative comprising nearly 500 family farmers that is currently seeking authorisation to export to China.

Poço Fundo’s mayor Rosiel de Lima, who is also a coffee farmer, says some kind of adverse weather affects production every year (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

The 16,000 inhabitants of Poço Fundo rely on farming to drive the local economy – the local coffee cooperative, Coopfam, comprises nearly 500 family farmers (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

For Coopfam, entering the Chinese market is a strategic growth opportunity beyond its traditional European buyers, which currently absorb more than 90% of its exports. The cooperative sees China’s fast-growing coffee demand as an “infinite potential” market.

Another coffee farmer and member of Coopfam, Lima lost 75% of his crop in a hail storm in 2021. Last year, a drought in the middle of the rainy season reduced the quality of the beans, contributing to a 40% drop in his coffee income.

“Every year there’s some kind of adverse weather: hail, frost, cold winds, drought, rain during flowering, at the wrong time,” explains the mayor.

Many producers are adapting by replacing older plants with varieties that are more productive, and resistant to water stress and disease.

This malformed coffee bean is the victim of lengthening droughts, intensifying heat and increasingly irregular rainfall (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Many producers are betting on new varieties of Arabica beans – such as Acauã Novo, Arara and Paraíso – which are more productive and more resistant to water stress and disease (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

To protect coffee seedlings from hail storms, some producers have installed protective nets over their nurseries (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)  

Others, like Paes, are using trees to help protect their crops. He has planted cedar and African mahogany trees to shade his coffee plants. He also practises techniques that improve the soil’s moisture retention, such as applying more fertiliser and keeping the earth between the coffee trees covered by planting grasses and legumes. Confident in this year’s harvest, he holds up a branch laden with beans. But then he adds: “You see a good patch of coffee, but right in front of it, another that has none. It’s not as uniform as it used to be.”

“It’s like this in practically all the plantations in the area,” says Alexander Ferreira, an agricultural engineer and technician at Coopfam.

Over the past four years, producers have spent over BRL 40 million (USD 7.9 million) in federal loans on restoring coffee crops, almost all of it in Minas Gerais state, where climate change is already altering the production calendar and yields. The author of Unifei’s 2024 study, Cássia Gabriele Dias, is a meteorologist and researcher at the university. She explains that droughts have become longer, heat has intensified and rainfall has become more irregular in the state. This affects crucial stages, such as flowering and the formation of coffee beans.

Most of the coffee plantations in Minas Gerais are concentrated at higher altitudes, mitigating the effects of global warming – for the time being (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

The soil on Douglas Lago’s coffee plantation in Santa Rita de Caldas retains more moisture because he plants grass, which keeps the earth covered and reduces evaporation during heatwaves (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Most of the coffee plantations in Minas Gerais are concentrated at higher altitudes, which, for the time being, mitigates the effects of global warming. “Regions further south, such as southern Minas Gerais, tend to remain more suitable. But they are not free from risks,” Dias tells Dialogue Earth.

Lima says the rise in coffee prices has provided some compensation to producers affected by the climate. According to Ferreira, the price of a 60 kg bag of conventional coffee in early 2025 shot up to more than double the 2023 price.

Organic production suffers

However, the costs of maintaining productivity in the face of climate change are rising, reducing real profits. Rosângela Paiva and her husband, Luis Carlos, are considering installing irrigation to cope with the increasingly frequent periods of heat and drought, particularly between July and October when flowering occurs.

Rosângela Paiva is considering installing an irrigation system on her plantation to cope with intensifying heat and droughts; she says coffee production has become very expensive (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Coopfam’s production supervisor surveys its coffee packing machines. The cooperative is currently seeking authorisation to export to China (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

“Producing today is very expensive,” complains Paiva. In Poço Fundo, she cultivates 5.5 hectares for Coopfam’s organic coffee line. Following organic methods, which avoids the use of synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, can increase coffee production costs by up to 30%.

Strong demand has led producers to prioritise quick gains in productivity, thus switching from organic to non-organic farming. At Coopfam, the number of organic members has fallen by almost 60% in two years, to 75 coffee farmers.

Ferreira estimates that organic coffee will once again become more financially advantageous when the supply of beans stabilises in the market, which could happen as early as this harvest. More stable weather conditions this year have led Conab, the government agency responsible for agricultural supply statistics and policies, to forecast a record harvest for 2026: sixty-six million bags, almost half of which will be produced in Minas Gerais. Rosana Mendes and Avair de Oliveira, also based in Poço Fundo, switched from organic to non-organic farming in 2025. They say they apply pesticides to grasses and weeds only, not to the coffee plants. Furthermore, Coopfam’s European Fairtrade certification prohibits or restricts the use of the more potent pesticides, such as glyphosate, which provides a layer of environmental protection even for non-organic crops.

Some Poço Fundo coffee farmers have decided to move away from organic methods and return to pesticide use in response to rising costs, but are applying them more judiciously than before (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

The couple have also replanted their coffee crop with more productive and resilient Arabica varieties – a strategy that has been gaining ground among producers in southern Minas Gerais. With these adaptations, they plan to increase production by 260% by 2027.

“The future of coffee farming is a mystery,” says Mendes. “We are studying and learning every day from the climate, from nature, from the plant itself, to adapt to whatever is necessary.”

The power of trees

To mitigate the adverse impacts of extreme weather, tree-shaded coffee plantations like Paes’s are gaining ground among small-scale producers in southern Minas Gerais. João Ademir Pereira has planted ipê (Tabebuia), pear, cambucá (Plinia edulis) and yellow jabuticaba (Plinia cauliflora) trees on a third of the three hectares he cultivates here. “The trees help balance the climate and soften the sun,” he says.

In the shade, the coffee trees produce a crop every year; without it, they tend to alternate between seasons of high and low yield. For this cycle, Pereira expects to harvest more than 30 bags per hectare, which is in line with the national average. Almost all his harvest is destined for export.

Preserved Atlantic Forest trees stand next to a coffee plantation in Santa Rita de Caldas, a town neighbouring Poço Fundo. Small-scale producers are harnessing the benefits provided by trees to stabilise their crops (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)   

In partnership with German coffee roaster Tchibo, which buys Coopfam coffee, the Minas Gerais Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IFMG) is researching ways to control pests. These include the leaf miner, a larva that burrows into the leaves and damages the beans. Irregular rainfall and above-average temperatures encourage its spread, but studies suggest the fruit and flowers of trees planted amongst the coffee plants attract predatory wasps that help control these infestations.

“We need to support small-scale farmers, because they are the most vulnerable to climate change,” says Lêda Gonçalves, an agricultural engineer and lecturer at the institute.

At an altitude of over a thousand metres, the mist and morning dew cool Douglas Lago’s coffee trees in Santa Rita de Caldas, a town neighbouring Poço Fundo. With plans to start exporting, his family has converted three hectares of degraded pasture into a coffee plantation for the new harvest, adding to six hectares already cultivated.

In contrast to tales of drought and extreme heat, Lago’s crop has been threatened by excessive cold. In 2021, a severe frost killed 60% of the family’s 10,000 plants. After replanting, another frost wiped out a further 2,500. “The climate is our biggest challenge,” says Lago.

Heavy summer rain approaches Lago’s plantation in Santa Rita de Caldas. The region’s irregular rainfall is prompting producers to plant trees that help protect their coffee crops (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Lago’s family has planted trees to mitigate these climate impacts. As well as offering protection from the heat, they cushion their coffee crops from hail storms. The family has also increased the density of their coffee plants to reduce water stress, and they keep native bees, which boost the pollination and nutrition of the beans. “If there’s no rain, there’s no water in the bean; if there’s no water in the bean, it doesn’t produce the sugar that coffee needs,” explains Lago.

The results are clear to see. Over the past two harvests, the family has achieved yields twice the national average. Last year, they won the speciality coffee competition organised by the cooperatives of Minas Gerais.

By turning to trees for solutions, coffee farmers like Lago are taking their first steps into agroforestry, a technique that remains largely unexplored in the region. This approach takes inspiration from Arabica’s native environment – the tropical highlands of Ethiopia. While planting trees in coffee plantations can assist in reducing heat and wind, comprehensive agroforestry integrates trees into a more complex system, in which they regulate soil moisture and the flow of water, carbon and nutrients. Agroforestry can create a more stable environment in which to grow coffee.

“Agroforestry is more self-sufficient,” explains Rafael Furtado, a local farmer with a master’s in agroecology and rural development. “It produces more resources than the system requires and relies less on external inputs.”

Rafael Furtado has turned to agroforestry systems for his two-hectare Poço Fundo coffee farm, and is seeking organic certification with a view to exporting the results (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Furtado says the productivity of his farm is not satisfactory yet – but he has achieved ‘really good quality’ coffee (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

study published in 2020 by the journal Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment indicates agroforestry systems can mitigate the effects of extreme weather. Projecting ahead to the year 2050, the study concludes that agroforestry could preserve up to 75% of Brazil’s coffee-growing areas.

When Furtado moved to his two-hectare farm in Poço Fundo four years ago, he inherited a coffee plantation that had relied on pesticides and chemical fertilisers. Since then, he has been eliminating synthetic inputs and developing an agroforestry system.

“My productivity hasn’t been satisfactory so far, but we’ve already achieved a really good quality,” says the farmer.

Furtado is now working to make his agroforestry system economically viable: accessing government credit for family farms; seeking organic certification with a view to exporting; testing new varieties and assessing which crops grown alongside coffee can earn an income, such as bananas, avocados and African mahogany.

The Brazilian government’s Pronaf Agroecologia fund provides up to BRL 250,000 (USD 50,000) per farmer to finance organic or agroecological practices. But as the most recent 12-month data release shows, financing totalled just BRL 10 million across all family farming sectors, from vegetables to cacao and coffee. International sustainable finance remains similarly early-stage: the Chinese agriculture business platform, COFCO International, is running a carbon footprint pilot for Brazilian coffee; Europe’s Rabo Foundation, together with COFCO, has launched a BRL 1.6 million impact-credit line for water resilience in Minas Gerais.

Furtado says coffee agroforestry still has “very low uptake” in Brazil due to a lack of technical knowledge, the need for more complex management, and greater returns in quality than in productivity. Even so, he sees this model as the best solution in the face of growing climate challenges.

“Once there is more research, institutional support and greater experience, it will be far more worthwhile to adopt this more diversified and complex system than to remain in monoculture in a scenario of climate extremes,” he says.

[ Read More ]

The Power of One Tree - The Very Air We Breathe

By Joanna Mounce Stancil, March 17, 2015 

Covering millions of acres of forested lands in the West, the Ponderosa Pine can grow to heights of over 200 feet. (U.S. Forest Service Photo)

The second in a series of blogs honoring the United Nation’s 2015 International Day of Forests

On Saturday, March 21, the U.S. Forest Service will celebrate the United Nation’s International Day of Forests. With such an important worldwide recognition of all forests do for us humans, the Forest Service would like folks to ask themselves: Do I really know how much trees contribute to my daily life?

Or, in another words, what is the power of one tree?

Just as we humans are comprised of many parts functioning together allowing us to do wondrous things, the anatomy of a tree is just as wondrous, empowering them with super hero qualities.

What am I talking about?  A tree has the ability to provide an essential of life for all living things on our planet – oxygen, and the power to remove harmful gases like carbon dioxide making the air we breathe healthier.

Here is how it works:

To keep it simple a tree is comprised of its leaves, stems, trunk and its roots.  When you look at a tree, note that about five percent of the tree is comprised of its leaves, 15 percent its stems, 60 percent goes into its trunk and 20 percent is devoted to its roots.

Here is the super hero part. Through a process called photosynthesis, leaves pull in carbon dioxide and water and use the energy of the sun to convert this into chemical compounds such as sugars that feed the tree.  But as a by-product of that chemical reaction oxygen is produced and released by the tree.  It is proposed that one large tree can provide a day’s supply of oxygen for up to four people.

Trees also store carbon dioxide in their fibers helping to clean the air and reduce the negative effects that this CO2 could have had on our environment. According to the Arbor Day Foundation, in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange.

So next time you take a deep breath of air give credit to a tree or hug a tree in thanks for what it gives us – the very air we breathe.

(Sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture)

[ Read More ]

Millions of dead bees spark pesticides debate in Uruguay

Agriculture has boomed in Uruguay over the past decade, but the accompanying rise in agrochemical use poses a problem for honey producers. 

In 2025, more than 85 beekeepers in Uruguay reported mass deaths, implicating 15,000 hives. Many more bees may have died however, as some beekeepers could face consequences for implicating the farmers who control their land (Image: Sebastián Demov / Uruguayan Beekeeping Society)

What began as isolated reports quickly turned into a mass mortality crisis that has reignited the debate on sustainable agriculture.

In late 2025, beekeepers in Uruguay began reporting that their bees were dying. Some 15,000 hives and more than 85 beekeepers were reportedly affected. Jihmy Fiorelli, president of the Uruguayan Beekeeping Society (SAU), says this could be less than the reality: “That figure could double, as many beekeepers did not want to report it out of fear.”

Typically renting space from landowners, apiarists fear being evicted for complaining.

Those complaints would be aimed at farming methods: in Uruguay, beekeepers set up their hives in soya, maize and rapeseed fields. The variety of flowers and the fertility of the soil on these farms aid steady honey production.

Blooming rapeseed fields in Nueva Helvecia, south-west Uruguay. The flora and soil fertility of crop fields like these make them ideal places to set up hives (Image: Peter Giovannini / imageBROKER / Alamy)

In 2025, there were 2,200 registered beekeepers in Uruguay and over 550,000 hives, producing approximately 9,000-12,000 tonnes of honey per year. However, this army of beekeepers is increasingly concerned that farmers’ use of pesticide “cocktails” poses a threat to their sector.

The pesticide cocktail

Uruguay’s bee colonies typically lose around 30% of their population each year, due to nutritional stress, and exposure to both agricultural pesticides and other chemicals. However, several researchers tell Dialogue Earth that the latter is an increasingly significant risk factor.

Estela Santos, an entomologist at Uruguay’s University of the Republic (Udelar), says the 2025 die-off could not have been due to natural causes: “We were able to confirm that it was a case of chemical poisoning. It cannot be explained by any disease.”

Insecticides were detected in only two of the 24 samples analysed in Santos’s study. This led the scientists to focus on other pesticides: the cocktail of herbicides and desiccants (drying agents) used in agriculture. They hypothesised these might combine to produce a lethal toxic effect, one not anticipated by analysing each product separately.

Gustavo Fripp is a beekeeper and delegate of the Honorary Commission for the Development of Beekeeping (CHDA) at the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries (MGAP). He explains that complex mixtures are often prepared to maximise the profitability of agricultural production: “Sometimes six or seven products are mixed together, and then we don’t know what the effect will be.”

Santos also highlights that, although the individual use of chemical inputs is regulated, there are currently no regulations in Uruguay requiring impact assessments for these mixtures.

The MGAP has informed Dialogue Earth that its investigations into the 2025 bee mortality event are so far inconclusive. No chemical molecule has been found that recurs systematically in all affected hives. Agustín Giudice, the ministry’s director general of agricultural services, says they are leaning towards a multi-causal explanation: nutritional, health and management factors, alongside exposure to agrochemicals.

The National Commission for Rural Development (CNFR), a group of family farm businesses, issued a statement in December in response to the deaths, urging that “all relevant investigations be carried out”. It also highlighted the importance of coexistence between beekeeping and agriculture.

Agricultural boom

Over the past decade, Uruguay has seen an expansion of agricultural land devoted to crops, particularly soya and maize, with production reaching record highs.

This growth, however, has been accompanied by a high volume of chemical inputs.

Preliminary data from the MGAP indicates 31 million litres of herbicides were imported in 2024. Paraquat – classified as moderately hazardous by the World Health Organization – was one of the most imported, after glyphosate.

Giudice asserts that these chemicals are necessary to ensure the sector’s competitiveness. According to Santos, however, they have ecological costs that extend beyond bees. He claims they affect the more than 500 species of insects in Uruguay that play a beneficial role in pollination, as well as the decomposition of organic matter.

Mangangás, as well as wasps and butterflies, are negatively affected by the agrochemicals used to fumigate farmed soils, say experts (Image: Lucas Ninno / Dialogue Earth)

Fiorelli says the impact of soil fumigation with agrochemicals causes a “monstrous ecological imbalance”, affecting wasps, mangangás (large bees native to South America) and butterflies.

Regulation and standards

For Santos, one of the biggest problems is that Uruguay assesses chemicals using “lethal dose 50” (LD50). This metric indicates whether a compound will cause the death of 50% of test organisms under laboratory conditions. LD50 ignores differences in local ecosystems in terms of climate, flora or pollinator behaviour, explains Santos.

These differences, Santos believes, could mean that international chemical standards are insufficient for assessing localised mortality: a specific imported chemical could prove to be more lethal in Uruguayan fields than its label suggests. He expresses regret that this has not yet “caught the attention” of regulatory agencies to prompt an update of impact assessment protocols.

There are also commercial implications. A recent study revealed almost 50% of the active ingredients in pesticides permitted in Latin America are not permitted in the European Union (EU), due to environmental safeguarding. Furthermore, 88% of the pesticide active ingredients that are approved for use in at least one Latin American country, and that are classified as high-risk by the World Health Organization, are not permitted in the EU. In particular, Uruguay has 86 approved active ingredients that are banned in the EU.

A recent legislative amendment also removed the obligation for farmers to report crop spraying. “This led to a sharp drop in the number of reports. Reinstating mandatory reporting is one of the main demands [of beekeepers],” says Fripp.

The agricultural landscape

Although experts and authorities claim intensive agriculture and beekeeping go hand in hand, in practice, the two industries appear increasingly at odds.

Beekeepers operate on farmland via private agreements, but these have become more fragile. According to Fripp, some agricultural associations argue they should have exclusive use of the land to produce, free from bee-friendly restrictions, while beekeepers claim they depend on precisely that same fertile area to carry out their activities.

Alternatives are emerging, such as integrated pest management (IPM) and the use of biological inputs. IPM is a production strategy that aims to reduce reliance on pesticides through systematic crop monitoring technology and the selective use of chemicals. Biological inputs follow the same logic, using products made from plant or insect extracts with less harmful chemicals – or none at all – to control pests and diseases.

Research suggests that training in these types of agroecological practices can reduce pesticide poisoning by up to 73%.

The use of biological inputs has begun in Uruguay, although Fripp points out that “they are more expensive and still represent a very small share of the market”. In any case, he stresses, biological inputs are not a “magic solution”, but must be integrated into a broader management framework.

Santos insists that true coexistence requires “learning to give way in terms of space, time and practices”, such as applying chemicals at night or avoiding spraying during plant flowering periods. These changes can protect pollinators.

Uruguay recently proposed a tax on those pesticides that the World Health Organization and the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization both consider to be the most dangerous to health.

Fripp says this is “a positive sign” but that the funds raised should go directly to beekeepers. After all, industry estimates place the value of the “free” pollination services they provide at up to USD 400 million a year.

[ Read More ]

Energy security is national security – and it starts at the subnational level

As the Gulf conflict plunges Southeast Asia into a deepening energy crisis, empowering local governments to transition from fossil fuels has never been more necessary. 

A sign announces that diesel has run out at a filling station in Prachuab Khiri Khan, Thailand, on 18 March, 2026 (Image: Grant Peck / Associated Press / Alamy)

The war in the Gulf region is being fought with weapons, but its wider consequences are economic. It is also another entirely predictable shock that exposes a deeper vulnerability: our continued dependence on fossil fuels.

Around a fifth of the world’s oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, now at the centre of escalating tensions. As the US called on allies to safeguard shipping routes from potential Iranian attacks and, more recently, seize control of the strait, the fragility of this corridor reiterates how exposed the global economy remains to geopolitical risk.

There is an uncomfortable contradiction at the heart of the international response. Just weeks before the world convenes in Colombia for the first major summit focused on phasing out fossil fuels, governments are mobilising to protect the very commodity driving both climate breakdown and geopolitical instability. Despite the lessons of the war in Ukraine and Covid-19, which sent energy and food prices soaring, our dependence on fossil fuels remains structurally unchanged.

The impacts across Southeast Asia are immediate and severe. Thailand is managing critically low energy reserves – around three months’ worth – forcing emergency measures such as work-from-home orders for state agencies. Fuel rationing has been introduced in Myanmar and the Philippines, where the government recently declared a national energy emergency. In some areas, essential services have been disrupted – from farmers unable to access diesel for machinery to cremations being delayed due to fuel shortages. As Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos Jr put it, countries in the region are “victims of a war that is not of our choosing”.

This is not simply a failure of climate policy – it is a failure of economic and security policy. We will not emerge from this crisis unscathed, but we can emerge from it clearer-eyed. Clean energy is no longer just an environmental imperative; it’s the only credible path to durable energy security and long-term economic resilience.

Homegrown clean power is a strategic necessity. Crises, whether geopolitical or climate-driven, are no longer exceptional events. They are becoming structural features of the global economy.

What must not continue to become structural is our exposure to fossil fuel volatility.

Why subnational governments matter

Some of the most decisive leadership is emerging below the national level. States, regions and devolved governments are increasingly treating climate policy as security policy. In the US, California has accelerated investments in renewable energy, battery storage and electric vehicles not only to meet climate targets, but to shield its economy from global fossil fuel volatility.

Across Europe, similar dynamics are playing out. North Rhine-Westphalia, long defined by coal and heavy industry, is investing at scale in wind and hydrogen as a means of reducing exposure to geopolitical shocks. In Spain, regions such as Catalonia and Navarre are pairing renewable expansion with green industrial policy, positioning clean energy as both an economic and security strategy. Scotland, with its vast offshore wind potential, is making a similar case for energy sovereignty.

These examples point to a broader shift: where national governments hesitate, subnational actors are moving ahead, reframing the energy transition as a matter of economic security as much as climate responsibility. What makes this level of governance so critical is not just ambition, but proximity to delivery.

States and regions control many of the levers that determine how energy systems actually function: planning and permitting for renewables, grid infrastructure, building standards, public procurement and increasingly, investment vehicles of their own. This is what energy security looks like in practice: not abstract commitments, but targeted investments in domestic capacity, flexibility and resilience.

It is also why financing subnational governments is so critical. Without access to capital at the level where projects are delivered, the transition will remain slower, more uneven, and more exposed to political cycles at the national level. Yet the transition remains profoundly uneven and far from just. States and regions are responsible for up to 70% of climate mitigation and over 90% of adaptation actions, and are often closest to affected communities. But they receive less than 17% of international climate finance, according to global subnational government network Regions4.

Southeast Asia: exposed and underfunded

According to the International Energy Agency, the current disruption constitutes the largest oil supply shock in history. It has exposed structural vulnerabilities in oil-dependent economies across Southeast Asia, raising the cost of transport and essential goods, straining public services, and disproportionately affecting lower-income households who face the brunt of energy insecurity. This is a stark reminder that fossil fuel dependence does not just carry environmental costs, but systemic economic and social risk.

Energy systems across the region remain highly centralised yet deeply exposed. Around 60% of the region’s oil imports come from Southwest Asia, leaving economies directly vulnerable to the kind of geopolitical disruption now unfolding. At the same time, demand is rising rapidly: electricity consumption increased by more than 60% over the past decade and is projected to grow at around 4% annually to 2035.

This demand continues to be met overwhelmingly by fossil fuels, which have accounted for nearly 80% of energy demand growth in recent years, with coal alone generating around half of the region’s electricity. What this creates is not just an emissions challenge, but a structural security risk with economies that are simultaneously growing, import-dependent, and locked into volatile global fuel markets.

There are early signs of a shift. In Indonesia, provincial governments are beginning to play a greater role in renewable deployment, particularly in solar and distributed energy systems. In Vietnam, local authorities have been instrumental in enabling the rapid expansion of solar in recent years, even within a centrally directed system. These examples are the exception rather than the rule, but they do illustrate that even in highly centralised systems, local implementation capacity can accelerate change when it is empowered and resourced.

A solar farm bordered by rice fields in Vietnam (Image: Thoai Pham / Alamy)

Yet despite this exposure, Southeast Asia attracts only a fraction of global clean energy investment – approximately 2% in 2023, highlighting a fundamental mismatch between risk and capital allocation. Financing subnational governments will be essential to closing this gap, enabling investment to reach the level where infrastructure is planned, permitted and delivered. It is at this level where, if action happens, communities feel the benefits. Whether it is multilateral or national development banks; sub-national development banks or the private sector; green bonds or blended finance, we cannot afford to underfund the frontline.

Regional cooperation as the key to energy security

Energy security in Southeast Asia cannot be achieved by countries acting alone. Initiatives such as the planned Asean Power Grid aim to connect national electricity systems, enabling countries to share renewable energy across borders and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels. The potential is significant: a more integrated regional grid could smooth supply, lower costs and reduce exposure to global shocks. But progress has been slow, constrained by political fragmentation, regulatory misalignment and concerns over sovereignty.

The question is not whether regional energy security can translate into national resilience, but whether governments are willing to build the trust and coordination required to make it possible. In a region defined by diversity, that will not be easy. But the alternative – continued fragmentation in the face of shared risk – is so much more costly, because when one region lags, the effects are widespread. We cannot mitigate shared risks in siloes.

This is the reality of a fossil fuel-dependent system where exposure amplifies risk. The uncomfortable truth is that we are not short of warnings. We are short of political follow-through. The answer cannot be a return to the status quo; it must be a more strategic and equitable acceleration of the transition, led by all key economic stakeholders including governments and businesses.

That means investing not only at the national level, but in states, regions and cities that are already driving progress. Financing subnational governments will be essential to building resilience where it is most needed, and to ensuring that the transition delivers security as well as sustainability.

In a world of compounding crises, energy security is national security. The question is no longer whether we should accelerate the transition to clean energy, but whether national governments are willing to align finance, governance and political will behind the actors already driving it.

[ Read More ]

    Powered By Blogger